International Bus Essay

1. Who argon the discordant stakeholders that Anglo American haves to realise as it charters an in effect(p) human immunodeficiency virus/ aid clay? The people are said to be the driving forces of a countrys economy. In southernmost Africa, support has greatly impacted the nations economy. As evidence, it was stated that from 1992 to 2002, the economy of South Africa disconnected over $7 billion every year which is approximately 2% of the countrys GDP. This is because of the death of workers with support. As AIDS prolong to spread, it will continue to bring down pat(p) the per capita growth of South Africa by 1 to 2% every year. Being a mining conglomerate, Anglo American operates in 45 nations and has over 107,000 employees. As Anglo American feigns an effective HIV/AIDS strategy, it should giveing gathering as stakeholders all nations that are greatly reliant on the graves produced by the African workers. Anglo American essential also consider wellness organizatio ns, South African government, and big companies. It is despotic for the people in power to actualise the impact of AIDS to the South African economy.2. What are the pros and cons of Anglo Americans adoption of an aggressive strategy in combating HIV/AIDS among its South African men? What recommendations would you give the union concerning its HIV/AIDS policy?Since Anglo American was greatly piss during the outbreak of AIDS, the company developed encyclopedic and dynamic approaches to combat the disease as it has become very ravaging to the workforce and its operations. The syllabus was made up of taproom initiatives with focus on education and awareness. The plan also hold dissemination of condoms, monetary as well as skill-related preparedness to lessen poverty, and a survey system that would monitor the pervasiveness of the disease. Later on, the policies were expanded and included counseling, testing, as well as carry on and wellness programs. Some of the pros of t he program include decrease payment for the patient as the number of people participating in the program increases.Despite the benefits of this aggressive strategy, in that appraise were many cons to this including the disapproval from many some other interested parties. The program has also been scoreless because of refusal of some employees to undergo ART. Some plain stopped during the treatment regimen. Other workers did non try submitting to the program because of fear of discrepancy while others were in denial of having been contacted with AIDS. A robust approach is essential in this matter. If discrimination is an issue for workers, then as much as possible, the company should adopt a program that will respect the privacy and confidentiality of the patients condition. In addition, since some patients are anxious approximately the cost of the treatment, the company must consider encouraging more stakeholders to support the program and deliver the treatment for free.3. Because such a large percentage of its workforce consists of unsettled workers who are more likely to receive and spread HIV/AIDS, should Anglo American adopt the policy of not hiring migrant workers? Should the South African government close the doors to migrant workers?Closing the doors to migrant workers would be another(prenominal) case of discrimination. Since the majority of the companys employees are migrant workers, the company must consider proper screening onwards hiring. In hiring employees, companies must make authoritative that the people are in good condition and are ready for work. A physical check-up must be required. migrator workers should not be stopped from work in Anglo-American provided that they meet the criterion of being HIV/AIDS-free.4. What role do pharmaceutical companies play in responding to the HIV/AIDS epidemic in South Africa? What policies or courses of action would you recommend to a company that produces HIV/AIDS drugs?Pharmaceutical compa nies are the ones responsible in manufacturing drugs needed for the treatment of HIV/AIDS. GSK for instance, deliver drugs to South Africa. However, Anglo American is hoping that pharmaceutical companies would reduce their prices to be commensurate to provide more drugs for the people infected with HIV/AIDS. Though pharmaceutical companies esteem toreduce their prices, they are also someway hesitant in fear of violating the sharp property rights. Policies or courses of action to consider to a company that produces HIV/AIDS drugs would be to lift up the rational property rights of drugs in nations such as South Africa which is in dire need of treatment.